<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obstacles and Challenges During Major Organizational Changes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://orgreadiness.com/2008/04/15/obstacles-and-challenges-during-major-organizational-changes.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://orgreadiness.com/2008/04/15/obstacles-and-challenges-during-major-organizational-changes.html</link>
	<description>Perspectives on Change Leadership and Change Management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 04:01:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Rock</title>
		<link>http://orgreadiness.com/2008/04/15/obstacles-and-challenges-during-major-organizational-changes.html/comment-page-1#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Rock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orgreadiness.com/2008/04/15/obstacles-and-challenges-during-major-organizational-changes/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the observation. I have a couple responses.

1) the statistic is 70% of the time the change runs into resistance from employees - not 70% of the employees resist the change.  You are right though - if folks misinterpret the statistic, then it misled.

(I play a game with my kids on statistics with the weather report by asking the question - is that 50% chance of of rain in 100% of the area, or is it 100% chance of rain in 50% of the area?  Either way, the weather forecaster is correct by saying a 50% chance of rain.  I&#039;m going to be teaching them the phrase &quot;Liars figure, and figures lie&quot; shortly.)

2) I have some statistics on the where the resistance occurs in the organization.  Unfortunately, in re-orgs, the resistance is at the middle manager level.  Where the resistance is in the organization is as important as how many people are resistant.  You have inspired another post. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the observation. I have a couple responses.</p>
<p>1) the statistic is 70% of the time the change runs into resistance from employees &#8211; not 70% of the employees resist the change.  You are right though &#8211; if folks misinterpret the statistic, then it misled.</p>
<p>(I play a game with my kids on statistics with the weather report by asking the question &#8211; is that 50% chance of of rain in 100% of the area, or is it 100% chance of rain in 50% of the area?  Either way, the weather forecaster is correct by saying a 50% chance of rain.  I&#8217;m going to be teaching them the phrase &#8220;Liars figure, and figures lie&#8221; shortly.)</p>
<p>2) I have some statistics on the where the resistance occurs in the organization.  Unfortunately, in re-orgs, the resistance is at the middle manager level.  Where the resistance is in the organization is as important as how many people are resistant.  You have inspired another post. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Rosenbaum</title>
		<link>http://orgreadiness.com/2008/04/15/obstacles-and-challenges-during-major-organizational-changes.html/comment-page-1#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Rosenbaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 14:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orgreadiness.com/2008/04/15/obstacles-and-challenges-during-major-organizational-changes/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>The figure on employee resistance is a little misleading. The overt, outright resistance to change in any organization is rather low.  It runs around 15%.  That&#039;s the squeaky wheel that gets all the attention.  The majority of the resistance to change is the 70% of employees who do nothing hoping the change will go away.  They are passive and will appear to go along with the change.  They just aren&#039;t going to do anything about it.

To make a change stick, it&#039;s critical to deal with this silent majority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The figure on employee resistance is a little misleading. The overt, outright resistance to change in any organization is rather low.  It runs around 15%.  That&#8217;s the squeaky wheel that gets all the attention.  The majority of the resistance to change is the 70% of employees who do nothing hoping the change will go away.  They are passive and will appear to go along with the change.  They just aren&#8217;t going to do anything about it.</p>
<p>To make a change stick, it&#8217;s critical to deal with this silent majority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
