<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Shannon&#8217;s &#8220;Mathematical Theory of Information&#8221; Shouldn&#8217;t Be Applied to Human Communication</title>
	<atom:link href="http://orgreadiness.com/2008/05/23/why-shannons-mathematical-theory-of-information-shouldnt-be-applied-to-human-communication.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://orgreadiness.com/2008/05/23/why-shannons-mathematical-theory-of-information-shouldnt-be-applied-to-human-communication.html</link>
	<description>Perspectives on Change Leadership and Change Management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 04:01:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: apj</title>
		<link>http://orgreadiness.com/2008/05/23/why-shannons-mathematical-theory-of-information-shouldnt-be-applied-to-human-communication.html/comment-page-1#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>apj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 14:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orgreadiness.com/?p=58#comment-44</guid>
		<description>As stated, Shannon was interested in encrypting communication to prevent communication. 

Communicating to internal and external publics requires agreed upon terms for understanding.  Communication becomes an ongoing process, a dialog back and forth managing the boundaries for communal understanding and a forum for clarifying misunderstandings.

Seemingly “understanding” is measured through behavioral actions of the receiver as intended by the sender.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As stated, Shannon was interested in encrypting communication to prevent communication. </p>
<p>Communicating to internal and external publics requires agreed upon terms for understanding.  Communication becomes an ongoing process, a dialog back and forth managing the boundaries for communal understanding and a forum for clarifying misunderstandings.</p>
<p>Seemingly “understanding” is measured through behavioral actions of the receiver as intended by the sender.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
